Here’s the federal government slant they’d like you to believe. Harry Reid and John Boehner were able to negotiate a budget agreement. President Obama is pleased that government is not forced to shut down.

Mainstream media will be reporting optimistic, celebratory news to show how wonderful it is that the two state-sponsored political parties were able to iron out differences and work together on a federal budget compromise.

Reporting of the truth about the budget, planned to increase the national debt, appears closed, kept from the mainstream.

It is true. The federal budget has definitely been compromised, just as it has been for years. This is planned bankrupting of the economy by budgets in which there are too many extremely expensive funding programs and big government departments that are sacred cows.

The President and Congress are planning to implement another out-of balance budget plan which will further bankrupt the federal government which has grown to 14.281 Billion dollars. The deficit numbers at the US Debt Clock are speeding up!

Much of what you’ve been seeing in the televised news media concerning a threatened government shutdown due to the House and Senate battling over 36 billion dollars in spending cuts, and arguments about whether or not to cut off federal funding for Planned Parenthood, has been nothing more than theatrics, with all the major players failing to tell the people the ugly truth. The truth is that there will be, (by plan!) no balanced budget. They can’t balance the budget since the federal government and elected politicians want to spend, spend, spend.

All the discussion about withholding funding of Planned Parenthood being a sticking point has very little to do with the proper running of government. It is nothing more than a distraction issue to keep the people divided and bickering rather than demand an actual balanced budget.

Recently, just one day of launching Tomahawk cruise missiles into a distant country (Libya) we weren’t at war with cost about 150 million dollars. Let’s see Congress get real bold and take back the power to start wars rather than serve the beck and call of the UN. It is not just Obama who thinks the President can launch us into wars. George Bush’ simultaneous wars were costing over a billion per month. That is a lot of zeros but it translates to real indebtedness.

A reduction of 37 billion dollars is less than 1% of the spending they plan to do. Double digit percentage cuts were needed. If you and I ran our household economy like this, we would be going deeper and deeper into debt and lose everything. If a small business were to do this, their creditors would shut them down. When deep in debt, the only way out of it is either to drastically increase revenue or drastically reduce the spending. Since the working class is already at the stress point, revenue increases would have to come from those who can afford to pay more by doing away with tax deductions for expenses only the wealthy can afford, such as private jets, yatchs, real estate holdings, and other write-offs that you and I cannot afford in the first place. The idea of reducing spending by getting back to an affordable defense budget and reducing the extravagant financing of the ever-encroaching and developing police state, where cops all look like like SWAT, seems to be sacred cows. To have a military strong enough to ward off all attacks is one thing, but the US spends more on defense than the next 10 countries combined. That kind of budget planning is unsustainable and idiotic.

Anyone who is able to balance their checkbook should see through the magicians smoke and mirrors and know that even if Reid and Boehner sent chocolates and flowers to each other, there is no cause for monumental celebration. An agreement to reduce an already bloated budget by cutting only 37 billion dollars or thereabouts is just a plan to continue in the red and further run up the debt. Does the federal government plan to fix the economy by getting serious about spending reductions? Ever?

If government had to plan to keep all planned expenditures at or slightly below projected revenue levels, double digit percent cuts in spending is required. Even a 10% reduction in spending, or about 370 billion dollars (or half the wall street bailout in 2008 during the Bush presidency), would still not put the federal government in budget surplus mode.

Although the politicians and mainstream media are doing a disservice by not reporting on the stark realities, so visibly displayed by the US Debt Clock, there are some segments of the population who have reason to celebrate. For example, this is very good news for those in the military who were in a panic because they weren’t sure if they would be getting paid, and when they might see their next paycheck. Many low-ranking enlisted personnel in the military live from paycheck to paycheck, and have no savings. They depend on that paycheck arriving on time.

Also celebrating are many government employees including the bureaucrats who have job security unlike anyone in the private sector. When you see agencies such as the NHTSA wanting to send hundreds of thousands of dollars to several states so that they will put up unconstitutional motorcycle roadblocks and hand out safety propaganda literature to promote helmets that are 63% ineffective, taxpayers should wonder how much they pay those statisticians and middle managers who come up with those figures and those ideas.

The federal government is the largest employer in the United States. At the end of the last millenium, during the Clinton administration, there were budget surpluses. The idea of budget surpluses changed drastically to budget deficits under the G.W. Bush administration which ran up over a trillion dollars in debt with invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, followed by sudden massive bailouts of mortgage lenders, investment bankers, and insurance companies during the final months of his failed presidency. The strategies of bailing out the wealthiest entities that are too big to fail was like stabbing a sword into the heart, but not of the wealthy. Instead of paying for their own gambling losses government intervened, forcing payments and indebtedness onto the middle class and the working class.

The Federal Reserve Bank, which is not federal but private, must be loving these out of control spending sprees, as the interest payments on the debt is making them and their few banker friends, many of whom are foreigners, wealthier than over 300 million Americans combined.

So as other news sources will be optimistically posting headlines cheering the fact that the government is open, you have to ask if it is really open government or if we are all being led down the wrong path, by plan. At least it is great to be in America where alternative news media sources are still allowed to rant from a different perspective than the mainstream media.

This is the NC Home editors’ opinion. It is what it is.

How light bulbs are going to make you thirsty.

In 2007, President G.W. Bush signed a law that will outlaw incandescent light bulbs. When the law goes into effect, within just a few years, a percentage of groundwater across America will be more poisoned by mercury than it already is. When those new mercury lightbulbs wear out or break, people are just going to throw them in the trash. From there, they get lugged away to a landfill, where the mercury will seep into the aquifer.

Robber barons from the energy industry understand all too well; oil and gasoline are not essential to life. Neither is gold. Water is.

As water resources are poisoned by the mercury from lightbulbs as a result of the law signed by Bush, and there is no more clean drinking water anywhere in America, expect G.W. Bush to hoard potable water from his 99,000 acre aquifer in Paraguay until the price is right. If you don’t buy the water from Bush, you might buy it from another Texan, T.Bone Pickens, who has bought up all the land which contains a large aquifer. Currently, large amounts of drinking water are being exported to China rather than being kept for Americans.

Anyone who has an IQ above 100, should recognize that when we talk about light bulbs, there is a much larger issue involved. The problem is, most people know government is going to do whatever the heck government wants to do, so they prefer to not think of the bigger picture, leaving it up to government, even if the ramifications are only several years into the future. So, for those people, we’re relegated to talking about the light bulb issue as if it is only going to be a daily inconvenience that will invade their life, as a limitation to their choices as consumers.

Even if the big picture does not get you so darn ticked off at government, as you should be, that you want to erect gallows in Crawford, and on the lawn of the Capitol and the White House, as a warning that you will not take these bad laws sitting down, does the smaller picture of removal of your choice of lightbulbs upset you enough that you might, at least, complain to your legislator? Do you think the government should be removing your choice, as a consumer, to purchase incandescent light bulbs?

The General Assembly will also review a much weaker bill regarding roadblocks and checkpoints. HB 381 would prevent police from setting up checkpoints in order to profile specific types of vehicles.

Make no mistake about it, those federal funds used to fund states to set up checkpoints do come from taxpayers wallets. The US House of Representatives is currently considering House Resolution HR 904 which would prevent the US Department of Transportation (DOT) from providing federal funds to create motorcycle only roadblocks (MOR).

NC Drought Map

Raleigh – Below normal rainfall has again thrust parts of central North Carolina into severe drought, and water resources officials are encouraging communities to prepare should dry conditions persist.

“At this point, public water supplies are fine in North Carolina,” said Woody Yonts, chairman of the N.C. Drought Management Advisory Council. “But if dry conditions continue to occur, widespread impacts could quickly surface in the next few months as the temperatures begin to gradually increase and the growing season begins.”

Forty-five counties are experiencing drought in North Carolina, according to Thursday’s federal drought map. Of those, 27 Piedmont counties are in severe drought, the second worst level in the four-category system used to measure drought. Thursday marks the first time since September that any part of the Tar Heel State has
experienced severe drought.
The drought map can be seen at ncdrought.org

The introduction of severe drought is based on impacts to streamflows and the flow of rain water into reservoirs – two main factors used to determine drought categories. A lack of significant rainfall in recent months has resulted in below normal groundwater levels and streamflows and less water than needed to replenish reservoirs in parts of North Carolina.

To extend available water supplies and maintain lake levels, many reservoir managers in North Carolina are only allowing minimum releases of water. It’s unusual to take such action to maintain lake levels during the winter when rainfall typically recharges North Carolina’s reservoirs, state water resources officials said.

In addition to the areas experiencing drought, 38 mountain and eastern counties are abnormally dry, according to Thursday’s drought map. Abnormally dry is not a drought category, but means drought could emerge without adequate rainfall.

Every major city in North Carolina will eventually be covered. Each of the major cities in North Carolina will have it’s own nchome.us site. At present, there is a main nchome.us website, and there are also many city.nchome.us websites, already set up and ready to go. All these sites need is reporters/writers/journalists/editors. There are also other sections, such as business, music, politics, US news and world news.